Posts: 6,074
Threads: 873
Reputation:
15326
Joined: May 2015
Lets admit, it is different....
My take on it is, it is with 3 players lined up wide right, and 3 players lined up wide left, leaving not as many blockers over center, my guess is that it is to set up a quick screen to either side and if it's not covered, it can go the distance with that blocking.....I know it spreads the field.....I do worry about a 1985 Bears blitz up the gut with less blockers, but maybe that is what Hue is trying to bait defenses into....
I'm still not sure this formation works, but it is very different. I saw the Houston Oilers try this separated O Line stuff in the very early 1970's, but I never saw it work. If Bengals make it work, it will be the first time I've ever seen it work. ...Bengals are 6-0, but I'm not sure how much the split O Line formations have contributed to the 6-0 start....I'm hoping for the best on this strange formation, but still not sure what the heck it is suppose to do against the defense. I'm only guessing at what it is I'm seeing, and maybe only Hue and the Bengals know what the heck it is. ...So far, the best part of this thing to me is that they don't use it all the time, lining up in many other formations. The Bengals do line up in many formations and I have seen 2 tight ends on plays, I have seen 4 man backfields like old 1960s college ball....and this split O line thing.....One thing about the 6-0 Bengals, you never know what is coming next as far as offensive formations. It is a very Multiple Attack Offense. Hue said he would use everything and the kitchen sink, and he sure as heck is.
1968 Bengal Fan
Posts: 726
Threads: 7
Reputation:
3368
Joined: May 2015
Emory and Henry formation
It's a pure #s game, and 4 option play, and the option goes towards the more confused side or where the numbers are best. Once they split out, if they are not prepared, the defense scatters to cover ground. Occasionally numbers or matchup favour one side and a screen pass is thrown that way. Typically as we've seen this year it's been an option run. 3 players and a QB vs 4 defenders. This turns into a read option, with the OL blocking everyone but one of the DEs, and Andy Dalton reads the DE.
While it's not typically the most explosive play, it's a very good way to get 5-10 yards based on matchups and it forces the defense to think about the option of the team doing that throughout the game
Posts: 6,074
Threads: 873
Reputation:
15326
Joined: May 2015
(10-22-2015, 12:14 PM)eoxyod Wrote: Emory and Henry formation
It's a pure #s game, and 4 option play, and the option goes towards the more confused side or where the numbers are best. Once they split out, if they are not prepared, the defense scatters to cover ground. Occasionally numbers or matchup favour one side and a screen pass is thrown that way. Typically as we've seen this year it's been an option run. 3 players and a QB vs 4 defenders. This turns into a read option, with the OL blocking everyone but one of the DEs, and Andy Dalton reads the DE.
While it's not typically the most explosive play, it's a very good way to get 5-10 yards based on matchups and it forces the defense to think about the option of the team doing that throughout the game
OK, what if a defense goes 1985 Bears and just sends everybody fast up the gut to clobber the QB with less blocking ?......or is it designed to beat exactly that ?...Then there are D Lineman such as that monster with Houston, and those guys with no blocking, I would not want to be the QB.
1968 Bengal Fan
Posts: 14,293
Threads: 294
Reputation:
31588
Joined: May 2015
It really helps to have a QB who has the ability to get rid of the ball really quick and who can tell when to tell the difference in coverage and protections. I wouldn't trust to many QBs to pull it off, but I'd trust Andy to spot that weakness and exploit it.
In the immortal words of my old man, "Wait'll you get to be my age!"
Chicago sounds rough to the maker of verse, but the one comfort we have is Cincinnati sounds worse. ~Oliver Wendal Holmes Sr.
Posts: 11,619
Threads: 131
Reputation:
59095
Joined: May 2015
(10-22-2015, 12:17 PM)kevin Wrote: OK, what if a defense goes 1985 Bears and just sends everybody fast up the gut to clobber the QB with less blocking ?......or is it designed to beat exactly that ?
Then you would get it out to the sidelines immediately. The numbers dictate where to go, so if they don't follow guys out wide you go wide, if they spread out wide with the numbers you go to a run. If you don't like the look you audible the Tackles back in.
Posts: 1,178
Threads: 3
Reputation:
3746
Joined: Aug 2015
I feel like part of it is just Hue wanting to make other teams spend valuable practice time learning how to defend a formation that will probably rarely have anything used out of it.
Posts: 14,293
Threads: 294
Reputation:
31588
Joined: May 2015
This ain't your father's run run pass offense of one Robert Bratkowski..
In the immortal words of my old man, "Wait'll you get to be my age!"
Chicago sounds rough to the maker of verse, but the one comfort we have is Cincinnati sounds worse. ~Oliver Wendal Holmes Sr.
Posts: 726
Threads: 7
Reputation:
3368
Joined: May 2015
(10-22-2015, 12:17 PM)kevin Wrote: OK, what if a defense goes 1985 Bears and just sends everybody fast up the gut to clobber the QB with less blocking ?......or is it designed to beat exactly that ?...Then there are D Lineman such as that monster with Houston, and those guys with no blocking, I would not want to be the QB.
What AU said. That ball gets out in a second to a wideout and with Andre and Zeitler against two defensive backs with Marvin Jones receiving, that is an easy TD
Posts: 82
Threads: 2
Reputation:
301
Joined: Jul 2015
(10-22-2015, 12:22 PM)grampahol Wrote: This ain't your father's run run pass offense of one Robert Bratkowski..
Hey now! Have some respect! It's the "run-run-shovel pass" offense.
Posts: 6,074
Threads: 873
Reputation:
15326
Joined: May 2015
(10-22-2015, 12:21 PM)Au165 Wrote: Then you would get it out to the sidelines immediately. The numbers dictate where to go, so if they don't follow guys out wide you go wide, if they spread out wide with the numbers you go to a run. If you don't like the look you audible the Tackles back in.
Yes, I have seen them audible the tackles back in, or just go ahead and run the play with the split O Line across the field...It is very different....As I say, The Houston Oilers tried this thing about 45 years ago, but I never saw it work, and it was mostly just laughed at by the Monday Night Team of Howard and Don and Frank. ...If Bengals make it work, it will be the first time I've ever seen it work. ....It is indeed a change-up. Not a formation Bengals use that much in a game.
I do appreciate the feed back because even the TV announcers don't know what this thing is and offer little info on it. The Emory and Henry Formation, it has a name. Most TV announcers can't give you that info. If I ever see this thing work for a big play, unlike the old Oilers, I may have to do the Dr Frankenstien and yell at the TV, " It's Alive, It's Alive ".
1968 Bengal Fan
Posts: 657
Threads: 20
Reputation:
933
Joined: May 2015
It's a formation almost immune to the blitz. At worst, the play is broken up and incomplete. At best, you get some decent blocking and break one. If a defense sees the offense so spread out though, I doubt they bring the house. Too risky.
Posts: 1,495
Threads: 69
Reputation:
4430
Joined: May 2015
Location: Eaton OH
They have run out of that formation a couple times for 4 yard gains. Not sure you'd call that "successful" but it gives the D something to think about and if a tackle is broken by the RB they are spread out and he gets to the second level.
To each his own... unless you belong to a political party...
Posts: 25,904
Threads: 652
Reputation:
243798
Joined: May 2015
Location: Jackson, OH
(10-22-2015, 12:17 PM)kevin Wrote: OK, what if a defense goes 1985 Bears and just sends everybody fast up the gut to clobber the QB with less blocking ?......or is it designed to beat exactly that ?...Then there are D Lineman such as that monster with Houston, and those guys with no blocking, I would not want to be the QB.
Then you audible back to a traditional alignment, and run a play as normal.
Volson is meh, but I like him, and he has far exceeded my expectations
-Frank Booth 1/9/23
Posts: 15,116
Threads: 221
Reputation:
147378
Joined: May 2015
I love this formation because it's almost guaranteed to pick up positive yards, simply because the ball goes wherever there's a numbers advantage. Not to mention it's just a cool looking formation.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
Posts: 20,791
Threads: 99
Reputation:
193499
Joined: May 2015
Location: Bluegrass Region
Hue is the maestro....
"Better send those refunds..."
Posts: 19,654
Threads: 144
Reputation:
162297
Joined: May 2015
Location: Covington, Ky
(10-22-2015, 12:17 PM)kevin Wrote: OK, what if a defense goes 1985 Bears and just sends everybody fast up the gut to clobber the QB with less blocking ?......or is it designed to beat exactly that ?...Then there are D Lineman such as that monster with Houston, and those guys with no blocking, I would not want to be the QB.
In the shotgun, Dalton would get the ball out quicker than a defender could get to him.
"The measure of a man's intelligence can be seen in the length of his argument."
|