11-05-2015, 08:10 AM
(11-05-2015, 02:31 AM)BFritz21 Wrote: Was dirty by Burfict, but we're not talking about the Bengals because we know they've always had problems.
We're talking about the Steelers not being the model for the class organization of the NFL.
Another nice attempt at deflection.
(11-05-2015, 02:52 AM)Murdock2420 Wrote: No shit, we've had problem children for a long, long time. We led the league in arrest at one point, and all you steeler fans went on and on about how that wouldn't fly there, and it's a class act organization, and that type of action isn't tolerated....and low and behold...it's actually not a classy organization at all, it's just like every other team in the league with it's fair share of crap human beings.
So Mitchell (in your opinion) is "dirty" because of a legal, clean hit so the Steelers should cut him because they have a better organization than the Bengals?
But Burfict and Jones have been shown to be dirty and its OK because the Bengals have always had problems with players...and therefore the Steelers should cut players who are not dirty?
Is there a "Smack Talk 101" for you guys to go to?