11-05-2015, 10:11 AM
(11-05-2015, 08:10 AM)GMDino Wrote: So Mitchell (in your opinion) is "dirty" because of a legal, clean hit so the Steelers should cut him because they have a better organization than the Bengals?
But Burfict and Jones have been shown to be dirty and its OK because the Bengals have always had problems with players...and therefore the Steelers should cut players who are not dirty?
Is there a "Smack Talk 101" for you guys to go to?
.....it seems maybe the Stoolers have had help maintaining that "polished image" that most of the league doesn't enjoy....
http://espn.go.com/espn/otl/story/_/id/12210027/pittsburgh-steelers-security-chief-dual-role-sheriff-officer-questioned
Maybe, just maybe, a lot of your trash has been swept under the rug......hmmmmmmmm
"Better send those refunds..."