04-01-2021, 01:11 AM
(03-31-2021, 09:50 PM)Beaker Wrote: The experts are split about 75/25 that Sewell is the best OT. Some still think Slater will be better than Sewell. Nobody thinks there are other WRs that are better prospects than Chase. Its Chase, then everyone else. And again look at the talent drop off from Chase to 2nd round prospects. It is much greater than the talent drop off from Sewell to 2nd round prospects. Sewell will likely be goos, but I said this before...which player, Sewell or Chase, has the better chance of not being as good as advertised? If you didn't say Sewell as the answer to that question, youre either blind or too stubborn to admit it.
Bro no ones arguing chase isnt gonna be a stud I’m sure he is and I agree the drop of is bigger at wide receiver than tackle from the first to second round. But that can be said about many positions compared to the other. It can be argued both Sewell and chase are both one of the few very top players in this draft. But our biggest need with a dead qb is offensive lineman. Wanting chase and then the best available tackle in round two is a big drop as well in talent from slater/Sewell to a leatherwood or radunz etc. our wide receiver group doesn’t need a first round talent they need a good player to stretch the field and man the X. The bengals hit on second round wide receivers blind folded. I will take Sewell/Bateman all day over chase/leatherwood. Again chase is a great talent but so it Sewell and he plays our biggest need at the most important spot behind qb and that’s protecting him. We have failed to do that time and time again cuz we get ooohhhhh’d and ahhhhhh’ by these flashy wide receivers instead of investing in the big uglies that win u games. Take Sewell then Bateman. Problem solved. Offensive line should be number 1 priority bottom line if u disagree then go back and watch last season. Specifically the Washington game.
