04-01-2021, 04:13 PM
(03-31-2021, 12:22 AM)Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 Wrote: The point wasn't that a dominant WR cannot get a team to a SB. The point was that a dominant OT/OL can get teams to the SB no matter who the receivers & backs are, as long as the QB is good. And our QB is better than good.
But the reverse is not true. A great QB, with great WRs does not mean crap if your line stinks. Just rewatch the SB.
Now, if you think Sewell is a just a run of the mill OT prospect, not that much better than the #5-#6 OT prospect we could land at 38, then we should take Chase.
But if you think Sewell is a generational OT talent, he has to be the pick. OT is a more foundational spot than WR.
Your statement is a better reflection of my thinking than my statement. Thank you