Congrats Bengals!

[BFritz21]

(11-05-2015, 08:10 AM)GMDino Wrote: So Mitchell (in your opinion) is "dirty" because of a legal, clean hit so the Steelers should cut him because they have a better organization than the Bengals?

But Burfict and Jones have been shown to be dirty and its OK because the Bengals have always had problems with players...and therefore the Steelers should cut players who are not dirty?

Is there a "Smack Talk 101" for you guys to go to?

The first video was while he was in a scuffle with a player, and, yes, it was wrong of him to throw his head in that direction, but he clearly had control of his head and could have bashed it into the helmet if he wanted to.  Heat of the moment with something that looked a lot worse than it was.  Before you say "the heat of the moment doesn't make it ok," I agree, but he obviously didn't intend to mash his head into the helmet and cause much damage or he would have done so.

Find a better example.

The second video of Jones was just an argument and shoving match with a player that used the n word for the entire world to hear.  Shoving matches and arguments happen all the time in the NFL, and most aren't done with known racists.

Find a better example.

Burfict's was dirty, but it's not even like he took a full swing at the guy's nuts.  It was a love tap, and considering that they're wearing cups, I doubt it did much damage.  That was dirty though.

I already mentioned why Mitchell's dirty.