Ring of shame team

[Shake n Blake]

(04-08-2021, 08:52 PM)Truck_1_0_1_ Wrote: Except he wasn't bad.

This is largely revisionist history, as someone like Jones only had 10 INTs in an 11-year career as a starter, while Artrell had 9 in 6 years, was much more active with ball skills and was a decent run CB and managed 3 sacks on top of it.

Artrell was never a world-beater, but he wasn't a, "bad CB."

Our defense posted these rankings in opp passer rating during Artrell's tenure:

27th (out of 30)
30th (out of 31)
26th (out of 31)
24th (out of 31)
32nd (out of 32)
25th (out of 32)

Sure, he's only one guy...but he was a big piece of the secondary for all those years, and saw his fair share of targets. I don't remember watching him or any of those guys and thinking "he's a decent player stuck on a bad team".

I did have him as the best of a bad bunch, hence why I didn't put him on my team, even with 3 CB's. I wouldn't say he was decent though. More like "less bad".