04-16-2021, 03:23 AM
(04-16-2021, 03:10 AM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: Well, the numbers are certainly “right” they just aren’t always indicative of future success. But if Sewell’s was better (8.98) I guarantee you would be pumping it.
Also, I would hope even the biggest Sewell guys would be able to admit his pro day (while good) didn’t exactly match all the “generational” start working on his bust for Canton level hype he had surrounding him beforehand.
Eh... I really don't buy into the numbers. They are another tool but far from accurate projections as you said. If a guy bombs the combine after years of good tape, he's still a workhorse on the field. Meanwhile workout warriors like John Ross can really elevate themselves too far.
I'm with you 100% on the pro day from Sewell was solid but nothing earth shattering. I still think he's better then anything we have on the line currently and by a good amount, but time will tell.
![[Image: bengals08-1-800small.jpg]](https://i.ibb.co/MRz4cC9/bengals08-1-800small.jpg)
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)