TeamPitts

[*TheLeonardLeap*]

(04-28-2021, 01:39 PM)Au165 Wrote: The idiot followed by the name seems redundant, maybe I “name” am an idiot and was wrong.

Not sure where 12 games came from, I mentioned Engram missing 4 but didn’t say that was a qualifier. You never said rookies don’t do it because they miss time you acted as if it was a skill situation. If healthy he hits 100 targets, that was my statement so if you want to do 100 over 16 or a prorated version down to 14 if he misses two games I’m in. Anymore than two games it’s probably a lingering issue and there are too many health factors at play.

It's not 12 games. It's 14. If he misses 4 or more (out of 17) it would void. Meaning he could miss 3 and still play 14, which would be the same as missing 2 and playing 14 in the past.

You were talking 120 before, and now you're saying he'd need to be completely healthy to even hit 100 or want a lesser number at a prorated amount? Where'd the confidence go? Weak, Au.