04-30-2021, 02:42 AM
I was team Sewell. But positive we'd take Chase, so not surprised.
Still think IOL is more of a need than OT. I would take Humphrey at 38.
Relative athletic scores at position group has him the #1 C since 1987. 4.0 GPA in college & high school. Two time all-american. Plus kind of nasty.
I can see why some want to go OT in 2nd: because you can still get a G in Rd 3 (Meinerz?/Davis). Whereas your quality OTs are likely played out by Rd1.But I prefer to take elite guys at their positions when you can. Humphrey is elite athletically, mentally, and in terms of performance and does not have injury history (Davis, Dickerson).
In terms of the board & OL getting picked, it went well for us.
Still think IOL is more of a need than OT. I would take Humphrey at 38.
Relative athletic scores at position group has him the #1 C since 1987. 4.0 GPA in college & high school. Two time all-american. Plus kind of nasty.
I can see why some want to go OT in 2nd: because you can still get a G in Rd 3 (Meinerz?/Davis). Whereas your quality OTs are likely played out by Rd1.But I prefer to take elite guys at their positions when you can. Humphrey is elite athletically, mentally, and in terms of performance and does not have injury history (Davis, Dickerson).
In terms of the board & OL getting picked, it went well for us.
