11-06-2015, 02:39 PM
(11-06-2015, 02:35 PM)clevelandsdad Wrote: Great assessments. They're both incredible in their own respects.
I would still say Brady is better though. It's incredibly cliche, but he does way more with less.
I know this is going to sound like a nitpick, but I could argue Rodgers does way more with less. Rodgers takes seemingly no-name, average talent receivers and makes stars out of them. I've seen Brady do the same in the past. I've also seen Green Bay not have good defenses and still win because of Rodgers and the same for Brady. When Gronk is missing Brady seems very beatable. Both guys can win even if they have no running games. The deciding factor for me is that while Brady has Belicheck, Rodgers has McCarthy. McCarthy might, MIGHT be a great coach, I don't know. But he is not as good as Belicheck and that advantage has always been with Brady.