06-22-2021, 03:44 PM
(06-20-2021, 07:36 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: Bingo. The Chargers made improving the OL priority #1, so that their young QB might be able to play more easily. The Bengals, took the route of adding another weapon, and putting OL in the backseat of their priority list.
Generally speaking, which strategy typically yields better results?
(06-21-2021, 02:11 PM)Essex Johnson Wrote: I cant agree we put it on the backseat but I agree Chargers went all in on improving their Oline for Herbert, he could be top 5 QB by end of season.
(06-21-2021, 04:24 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: How could you not agree that the Bengals put improving the OL on the back burner, this offseason? Other than signing an aging vet to a one year deal, and trading back for a Guard in the 2nd round, seems like Defense got most of the attention this offseason.
You guys just don't get it.
Chargers already had a top 10 defense. Chargers did not lose two free agents that got over $13 million a year.
Of course it was much easier for them to spend more on the O-line. They were in a completely different position than the Bengals.
It cracks me up when people suggest that we should have spent everything on O-line because we did not have any needs anywhere else on the roster.
