$309.2m

[Stewy]

(07-27-2021, 01:47 PM)Wes Mantooth Wrote: Not sure what market size has to do with this.  There's plenty of teams who are in huge markets who also saw similar attendence figures as the ones in smaller markets.  I can't imagine the Jets, Rams or Chargers saw any more money from these sources than teams like the Bengals, Bills or Packers.

You'd be 100% wrong.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikeozanian/2020/05/18/the-stadium-revenue-each-nfl-team-will-lose-if-games-are-played-without-fans/?sh=37093303691a

(07-27-2021, 02:01 PM)Frank Booth Wrote: calling the packers small market is like calling the steelers small market

yes compared to other cities, green bay and even pittsburgh are tiny

but fanbase wise? Those are 2 of the top 5 largest fanbases.

Note:  I was not arguing this point nor did I mention Merch sales outside of stadium revenues because those are licensed and spread evenly throughout the league.  So no Team gets any more $$$$ for having a large fanbase/merch sales than any other.  https://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2016/10/03/good-question-sports-merchandise/

Individual Team income is affected by everything associated with the stadium - tickets, luxury boxes, license fees, parking, concessions, etc.  What you made the year before affects how much you expect to make the next year, which is called a  BUDGET.  If you lose 30% of your revenue unexpectedly then this leads to a deficit and in the case of the packers a loss, because they had ~147mUSD cut from their budget due to COVID.