08-28-2021, 12:17 PM
(08-28-2021, 10:59 AM)fredtoast Wrote: I don't know why so many fans claim that "based on the past" they will keep Zac after a third losing season. Just look at what they have done in the past.
They did not keep Marvin after three losing seasons.
They did not keep LeBeau after 2 losing seasons.
They did bring back Coslet after three losing seasons, but he only lasted three games.
So based on "history" Zac won't be back after three losing seasons.
Nothing in my post says one word about anything "based on history". Do you really get the feeling after hearing anything they've said about Taylor over the last 2 seasons that they're eager to cut bait before his deal is up? If anything, it almost sounds like they want any of Taylor's short comings to be served up as punishment to fans who wanted Marvin gone. Mikey has said that they are committed to Zac and that his development is seen as a long-term process by ownership.
We have a coach with a long leash and a long contract. Has nothing to do with history.
