09-14-2021, 07:33 PM
(09-14-2021, 04:34 PM)Nately120 Wrote: These arguments could be held against the "impressiveness" of the 2011 Bengals, as well. At any rate, Nagy had 10 more wins than ZT...you can come up with all sorts of reasons why 2-14 is as good or better than 12-4 but I'm not seeing it. The Bears were 5-11 when Nagy took over and they went 12-4 his first year. ZT took over a 6-10 Bengals team and went 2-14.
Nagy > ZT
We won 1 game so far this year, let's not go overboard here.
I am not saying ZT is better than Nagy, but that Nagy might be a bit overvalued given that first year.