10-05-2021, 05:22 PM
(10-05-2021, 05:03 PM)Truck_1_0_1_ Wrote: Kitna didn't have a good year with un until '03; Chad has 2 seasons (as I mentioned above) with dogshit and a 3rd, though he wasn't in peak form (clearly) and he was hurt for a few games.Im not going to deny Chad Johnson's dominance.
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/cin/2001.htm
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/cin/2002.htm
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/cin/2008.htm
And people still aren't understanding that Curtis wasn't up to the level of his peers, whereas Chad was ABOVE 99% of his peers. Just acknowledge that.
And again, you have provided no stats to beef up your argument, none.
Less than 26 attempts a game?
Browns, 31.2 attempts in 1952. Their opponents? 29 attempts per game.
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/cle/1952.htm
Colts, 31.3 attempts in 1961.
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/clt/1961.htm
Vikings, 29.8 attempts in 1966.
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/min/1966.htm
Now, these are 3 teams I picked at random, who had more than 26 attempts per game, decades before Curtis was even in the league.
In Curtis' best year, 1975, the Bengals had 30.9 attempts a game.
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/cin/1975.htm
How is it that each reason that is brought up, gets blown out of the water? Or how is it, that when talking about the EXACT player, on the EXACT team he played on, your reasoning still gets debunked?
I don't know why people just can't accept that the guy was not at the level of others; there's bias from the word go, on the Curtis 1st people, but come on, you're just as bad as Fred in this case, with his manipulation and distortion of stats.
Was he the best WR in the NFL say from 2003 to 2009
Top 5 easy.
But Curtis was just as feared in his prime.
He averaged a TD every 8 catches for his career.