10-10-2021, 01:57 AM
(10-10-2021, 12:51 AM)Benton Wrote: Isn't that a bit of a double standard?
People shouldn't judge Pitts because TE's take a season to get going... but do judge Sewell, even though tackles typically take 3-4 years to get going?
I remember an article years ago that had something to do with approximate value at different positions. OL didn't really hit their stride till something like year seven or eight. Which on one hand has me really hopeful with Jonah (maybe considering the injury history, he takes a smaller contract when it's time, but can play the majority of it). On the other hand, it means we need to invest a lot more in tackles, either by competing in FA or doing better at growing our own.
It 100% is, and that was the only reason I even came back and posted in here again. When it benefits a player that posters like then we use PFF and we rate right now. When it doesn't benefit, PFF is wrong and we need years to rate a guy.