Burfict on injury list, tweaked knee?

[jowczarski]

(11-16-2015, 01:31 PM)gobobro Wrote: 1. Being essentially banned from football until you test clean should eliminate in-season "juicing."

2. Maybe modify the concept. Make the player apply for an exemption during injury, and have a provision of the exemption be that the NFL can have a doctor(s) crawling all through the medical records.


It seems there should be a way to monitor and regulate traditional PED usage in a way that hastens a return to health without hurting the integrity of the game.

Honestly the integrity of the game was shot in the 80s when anabolic steroids came into fashion. The league is littered with HGH users, as is every pro sport - team or individual. The NFL does test for it, but it's one just test and the players kind of know when it's coming. They also know when the other tests are coming. Basically, you have to be an idiot to get caught for breaking the substance abuse rules. All of this performance has not come about naturally. Ideally most of it has, but it's 2015. We know what we're signing up for enjoying pro sports.

As for punishment, guys get dinged on a yearly basis, get banned four games, and it's afterthought. How many "Joe Smith is back from suspension..." or "The team will get by until Joe Smith is back from suspension...." It doesn't carry the stigma as it does in Major League Baseball. Maybe - maybe - if the result was an unpaid ban for a year you'd see it truly cut back, but again, the testing mechanism is kinda b.s. 

Part of it logistical, though. HGH is often used to aid in healing quicker, not so much for mass building. And let's be real - what these guys do to their bodies week in and week out is incredible. So if you were to totally take away all their "extra" methods for recovery, rosters would have to expand, IMO.