06-04-2015, 12:27 PM
(06-04-2015, 10:58 AM)WhoDeyWho Wrote: They were a "different" team. They had a rookie QB and a rookie WR.
True, but the 2010 and 2011 team both had the same number of wins against winning teams. The 2010 schedule was brutal and while 2010 stunk and 2011 was encouraging I just don't think there was a really big difference in the talent levels between the two teams...at least not enough to justify a 5-win swing.
The number of teams the 2010 Bengals played that ended the season with 10-14 wins was just ridiculous.