Cure For HIV/AIDS?

[*rfaulk34*]

(11-21-2015, 11:26 PM)BFritz21 Wrote: lol!

Chemotherapy actually is what makes his theory valid!

I don't know how many times I have to explain chemotherapy to you, but chemotherapy isn't exactly a "cure," but rather is just a poison that kills most things it comes into contact with in the body, but the hope is that it kills the cancer before it kills too much of the body.

Do you really think a "cure" would cause hair loss, vomiting, diarrhea, pain, fatigue, mouth and throat sores, sexual and reproductive issues, and I'm sure there are many more side effects I'm forgetting?

The money is made off of the drugs to counter all of those side effects.

A cure wouldn't be more valuable because 1 a cure is a one time thing and 2 they would just keep coming up with cheaper ways to make the cure since it can't be copyrighted.  

What's hilarious is you just said (and have many times before) that chemotherapy is a cure, yet your last sentence states that a cure would be more valuable!  If chemotherapy is a cure, why isn't it more valuable than itself!?

Any time you want to believe that anyone would want to cover up a cure for cancer because treatment would make them so much more money...you need to realize the scores of thousands of people that are looking for a cure. It's not like there is one or two research labs that could easily be controlled. 

It would be impossible for anyone to suppress a cure for cancer. Money has absolutely no say in the matter.