11-21-2015, 11:59 PM
(11-21-2015, 11:46 PM)BFritz21 Wrote: It's not exactly easy to find a cure, which is why it's easy to suppress a cure.
Most recent example is when you'd wrap chemo in protein, and, since cancer loves protein, the cancer attacks the protein, and then the chemo is unleashed in the cancer when it tries to consume the protein.
People say that it might just be in testing phases, but you'd hear more about it if it wasn't being suppressed, plus it had already been tested on a lot of patients.
However, not as many drugs (if any) are needed to counter the side effects, making it non-profitable to drug companies.
1. If this were true then it would apply to every disease, not just cancer. We would never get any cures for anything.
2. So many types of cancer kill the patient that there is not really that long a period of "treatment".
3. Pharmaceutical companies are not the only ones working on cures for cancer. Private foundations and colleges are also working on cures, and they have no reason to suppress cures.
4. A cure would make a pharmaceutical company more money that treating the symptoms.
5. We do have cures for some types of cancer.
6. If you read about a promising cure on the internet then that is proof that it was NOT being suppressed. If you were able to find it then so were many other private researchers.
7. IF COMPANIES WERE NOT GOING TO MAKE ANY MONEY OFF A CURE THEN THEY WOULD NOT BE SPENDING MILLIONS OF DOLLARS ON THE RESEARCH.
