01-12-2022, 12:23 PM
(01-12-2022, 12:14 PM)JaggedJimmyJay Wrote: It’s a flawed process that people can take or leave.
What should be obvious though is that relying only on classical statistical production and/or the extreme limitations of the “eye test” is also highly flawed.
Is the latter *more* flawed? I certainly think so, yes. But that doesn’t imply the former is Gospel.
The only true way to get the most accurate analysis is for having someone on the team assessing every play of every player and releasing that analysis.
Only someone within the team who knows the play calls and assignments would really be able to grade the player.
Until we have that, we're always going to have some degree of missing/flawed analysis.
Zac Taylor 2019-2020: 6 total wins
Zac Taylor 2021-2022: Double-digit wins each season, plus 5 postseason wins
Zac Taylor 2023: 9 wins despite losing Burrow half the season
Zac Taylor 2024: Started 1-4. If he can turn this into a playoff appearance, it will be impressive.
Sorry for Party Rocking!
Zac Taylor 2021-2022: Double-digit wins each season, plus 5 postseason wins
Zac Taylor 2023: 9 wins despite losing Burrow half the season
Zac Taylor 2024: Started 1-4. If he can turn this into a playoff appearance, it will be impressive.
Sorry for Party Rocking!