01-22-2022, 08:11 AM
(01-22-2022, 12:56 AM)Benton Wrote: Eh, it already beat 01.
Smith solid, wouldn't trade him for Burrow. Nowhere close.
Chad, outstanding. Tee could potentially be better.
Rest of the draft was Rudi and Housh (both solid players) versus five guys who at at least contributed in their second seasons.
01 was a good year, but 20 beat it.
It's ok to admit we did good. Why? Cause we did.
As much as we all think/believe Burrow and Higgins have a bright future ahead of them, how can we say it "already beat" a class that produced 2 HoF nominees AND a Pro Bowl WR and Pro Bowl RB?
That seems a little preemptive.
____________________________________________________________