I Thought Perine Cost Us The Game......

[PAjwPhilly]

(01-23-2022, 07:29 PM)Truck_1_0_1_ Wrote: 1. While Perine should have had that, that wasn't an INT. Damn Horseshit call.
2. No, because I'm not doom and gloom like the guy quoted below.


Of course you would.

I agree. The point of the ball was buried below the grass line and it even kicked up some dirt as the defender brought it back towards his body


I don't see how you can say that the reception was not assisted by the ground stabilizing the football. Did it look like he had control, yes, but it was clear the point of the ball was resting on the ground. It was more picking a ball up > catching a ball flying through the air.