MyBB Internal: One or more warnings occurred. Please contact your administrator for assistance.
Why Was the Perine 3rd and 1 Not Reviewed ?
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why Was the Perine 3rd and 1 Not Reviewed ?
#1
It certainly appears to have been a first down and a very bad spot by these refs. Why did the NFL not review it? I'm sorry, but like for many of you, this has been a difficult day for me as I've had a chance to reflect how very close we were to making this first SB win happen. I could name off a half a dozen things, where if just ONE of them had gone the Bengals ways, they win. Every one went against us. I just have a very bitter taste in my mouth about this game . I do not buy into the scripted or rigging conspiracies at all. However, I was left with just some shitty and odd vibes about this one. I bet each of you could make a list of at least four or five things, where if one of them goes our way we probably win.

Start here: The Perine run on 3rd and 1.. looked like a first down. Referees obviously felt otherwise. Why was it not reviewed?
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Why Was the Perine 3rd and 1 Not Reviewed ? - Science Friction - 02-15-2022, 12:34 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)