02-20-2022, 04:16 PM
(02-20-2022, 03:00 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: You're telling me you don't think it would have been huge if Burrow was sacked 13-14 times less during the regular season? That's like if you could remove and entire Trey Hendrickson season worth of punishment off Burrow.
37-38 sacks vs 51
I call that huge.
You can call it "huge" all you want, but that does not mean it is.
I do not see any real correlation between sack umbers and injuries. Lots of QBs have been sacked a lot more times than Burrow without getting injured and on the other hand Carson Palmer got his knee shredded behind a line that set the team record for fewest sacks.
And 14 sacks out of over 1000 offensive plays is probably not going to make a "huge" difference in winning % either. It is not even going to effect every game because it is less than a sack per game.