02-20-2022, 04:43 PM
(02-20-2022, 12:54 PM)Au165 Wrote: People trying way too hard to come up with reasons to move on from Boyd and it’s comical. We can talk about the 2nd down throw in the last drive where Burrow wanted Chase to go deep and he broke it off early and burrow bombed it to no one, we cutting Chase now?
They aren’t moving on from Boyd, you need THREE legit receiving threats in the NFL today to protect yourself from doubles. The Chiefs have actually struggled with this for two years and it’s caught up with them each time. If you move in from Boyd no one has answered where this 3rd receiving threat is coming from. Bottom line they aren’t moving on and the money claim doesn’t even actually make sense as you don’t need that money, there are plenty of mechanics to do what they need to do without it.
This isn’t Madden, cutting team leaders versus letting the guys who got you there run their course and do their whole career in a place is bad for the organization. All that culture stuff we have been working on goes out the door quickly when you try to get too penny smart and pound foolish.
The Chiefs have 2 WR threats, been to 4 straight AFC Championships, 2 Super Bowls.... but we get it right?
Solid oline is worth more than having a $10M WR3. It's as easy as this: Are we better in the SB with a $10M G instead of Adeniji and Trent Talyor at WR3 or with Adeniji and Boyd?
