03-05-2022, 03:42 PM
(03-05-2022, 01:37 PM)Bengalbug Wrote: If we were to sign Connor, no reason to have mixon. Period. They are redundant in nature. They don’t compliment one another.
Almost identical career YPC (4.1 mixon vs 4.2 Connor). In fact, connnor had a much worse YPc last year with the better OL (3.7 v 4.1).
But sure, you are right.
And yet, the Bengals still used Perine on third downs who converted 18% of 3rd downs compared to Conner’s 56% while converting more than double the number of 3rd downs compared to Mixon and Perine combined while running behind a line ranked middle of the pack and only 4 spots ahead of the Bengals. I used Conner to replace Perine, not Mixon.
If you have an idea of how I could better allocate 2.16% of the salary cap I’m interested. I’m not interested in uninformed, incorrect opinions with no basis in reality because you’re too lazy to do your own research before engaging your mouth; like Conner is a waste on 3rd and 1 or you’re not sure if Conner is a better receiver when he only caught 95% of his targets which is better than both Mixon and Perine and it would take 30 seconds to Google that shit during the Information Age with your cellphone in your hand right now.
