What Pollack wants in OL

[*ochocincos*]

(03-05-2022, 03:42 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: And yet, the Bengals still used Perine on third downs who converted 18% of 3rd downs compared to Conner’s 56% while converting more than double the number of 3rd downs compared to Mixon and Perine combined while running behind a line ranked middle of the pack and only 4 spots ahead of the Bengals. I used Conner to replace Perine, not Mixon.

If you have an idea of how I could better allocate 2.16% of the salary cap I’m interested. I’m not interested in uninformed, incorrect opinions with no basis in reality because you’re too lazy to do your own research before engaging your mouth; like Conner is a waste on 3rd and 1 or you’re not sure if Conner is a better receiver when he only caught 95% of his targets which is better than both Mixon and Perine and it would take 30 seconds to Google that shit during the Information Age with your cellphone in your hand right now.

Conner is a pretty solid bigger RB2 who can fill in as a RB1.
He's shown he can make catches, putting up 34+ each season for the past 4 seasons.
He actually had fewer receptions than Mixon last year (37 vs 42) but more yards (375 vs 314).
I'd be ok with him replacing Perine, but after getting 16 TDs last season, I think he'll be too pricey for what the Bengals would be willing to spend on a RB2/3.

Depth RB is definitely cheap though for some decent production.
So many RBs hitting FA that only cost $2 mill or less last year.
You don't find many that are decent and 230+ lbs nowadays though to be that hammer.
Maybe a guy who is just above 220 would be ok.