03-10-2022, 02:58 PM
(03-10-2022, 01:08 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Then upgrade the more important position instead of overpaying a FS.
You're projecting replacing Boyd with someone else because you believe Bates is a higher priority. Well, do a different projection because you already admitted CB is a higher priority than FS. You're completely inconsistent in your logic.
If that is true and you're argument is consistent with your own logic supporting your position, you should be prioritizing CB over FS and WR3. But, your argument doesn't follow your own logic. It's scattershot at best.
1. Why isn't the opposing defense in nickel vs 3 WRs?
2. Do only WR3s run hitches or slants? If that's true maybe the offense shouldn't be so predictable.
This is another ridiculous subjective statement not grounded in reality.
Last draft there were nine WRs that meet just your speed requirement of 4.3s. Only one matched or exceeded Boyd's production as a WR3 and that was Ja'marr Chase as a WR1. The only other two that even came close were R. Moore and E. Moore both of which were drafted in the second round. The other six WRs with 4.3s speed combined didn't match Boyd's production. It would take those six WRs combined with either R. Moore or E. Moore to get more production out of a rookie WR than Boyd. And unless you're willing to spend a 1st or 2nd round pick on that type of receiver to replace Boyd at WR3, you're living in a fantasy. We both know you aren't suggesting spending a 1st or 2nd round pick on a new WR3. But, if you have some info that suggests otherwise, show me. I'd love to see it.
Then by your own logic and assessment of the roster, you should be directing dollars to improve CB instead of FS or WR3. But, you don't follow your own logic.
I have no issue upgrading CB over FS. But CB is a huge cost vs a rookie replacement at WR3 and we still need a replacement at FS so you are adding 2 players. And both the CB & FS must be solid or we are screwed. WR3 is low risk.
You're projecting replacing Boyd with someone else because you believe Bates is a higher priority. Well, do a different projection because you already admitted CB is a higher priority than FS. You're completely inconsistent in your logic.
Again, I hate calling you names but it is so frustrating when you refuse to even try to comprehend the message. CB is higher priority than FS but as I said 50 f-ing times Im going by our current roster. We need to pay big for a CB that isnt here yet. We would need to replace Bates with a player that isnt here yet. Both of these guys must be solid. I can replace WR3 with a rookie at low cost and if he isnt great that isnt a huge loss if our oline is much improved.
These questions mean nothing - Im not getting rid of WR3 simply adding a less expensive, younger, faster player.
1. Why isn't the opposing defense in nickel vs 3 WRs?
2. Do only WR3s run hitches or slants? If that's true maybe the offense shouldn't be so predictable.
Last draft there were nine WRs that meet just your speed requirement of 4.3s. Only one matched or exceeded Boyd's production as a WR3
Again, for the 500th time, I dont care about Boyds production in an offense running half the playbook forced into dink and dunk situations due to a terrible oline in which the WR3 is a good option due to coverage by a LB.
Let me type this slowly, maybe it will help... IN MY OPINION with a much improved oline we become a better rushing offense which keeps LBs at home and provides more time for deeper route concepts geared for Chase & Higgins. We still have a WR3 and TE but without as much reliance. This is an explosive and sustainable offense, again IN MY OPINION.
