03-10-2022, 04:43 PM
(03-10-2022, 04:05 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: Yet, knowing all this, you still insist upon overpaying a FS for one year instead of applying that money to any of the priority position to a long term contract instead.
I dont insist on over paying a safety - I simply said it is a much riskier proposition with what we have today.
If we were told hey Boyd is traded for a draft pick and rookie will start at WR3, we would be ok... lets check it out.
If we were told hey Bates is traded for a draft pick and rookie will start at FS, we would be a little less confident and asking who our CB1 was?
We like the money saved and the youth at both spots, but FS requires 2, maybe 3 guys for us to be truly comfortable (New FS, CB1, and maybe a vet FS as insurance?)
