Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
SI.com - FA OL Scheme Fits
#6
(03-11-2022, 01:16 PM)casear2727 Wrote: Sans used to think this as well I do believe, until he viewed the 22tape.  Jensen is a Dude.

He is definitely not a fan of Daniels and really doesnt like Allen (I agree here).

I like Bozeman, he is not a great athlete for the wide zone but a very solid pass blocker.

Mike Sans used the term many have honed on from Pollack - "Glass eater."

So while Jensen might not be quite as athletic as some other options, he's still 1) not unathletic, and 2) has that finisher mentality that Pollack said he wants.

I don't agree though that he doesn't like Daniels or Allen. He wouldn't have rated them a 7.5 each if that was the case.

I would say the glaring player that a lot have clamored for but Sans really slams is Bozeman. 3/10 is about the worst scheme fit out of everyone on the list.
Zac Taylor 2019-2020: 6 total wins
Zac Taylor 2021-2022: Double-digit wins each season, plus 5 postseason wins
Zac Taylor 2023: 9 wins despite losing Burrow half the season
Zac Taylor 2024: Started 1-4. If he can turn this into a playoff appearance, it will be impressive.

Sorry for Party Rocking!

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
SI.com - FA OL Scheme Fits - ochocincos - 03-11-2022, 01:00 PM
RE: SI.com - FA OL Scheme Fits - Synric - 03-11-2022, 01:02 PM
RE: SI.com - FA OL Scheme Fits - ochocincos - 03-11-2022, 01:24 PM
RE: SI.com - FA OL Scheme Fits - Synric - 03-11-2022, 01:30 PM
RE: SI.com - FA OL Scheme Fits - fredtoast - 03-11-2022, 01:14 PM
RE: SI.com - FA OL Scheme Fits - magikod - 03-11-2022, 01:39 PM
RE: SI.com - FA OL Scheme Fits - Dr.Z - 03-11-2022, 02:58 PM
RE: SI.com - FA OL Scheme Fits - pulses - 03-11-2022, 08:32 PM
RE: SI.com - FA OL Scheme Fits - bfine32 - 03-11-2022, 04:52 PM
RE: SI.com - FA OL Scheme Fits - pulses - 03-11-2022, 08:18 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 9 Guest(s)