Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
SI.com - FA OL Scheme Fits
#26
(03-11-2022, 07:51 PM)Nate (formerly eliminate08) Wrote: Yes, if there is a reason we don't sign Daniels it is because Pollack wants someone stronger and more physical like Jensen or one
of the more physical Guards like Scherff, Cappa or Tomlinson.


Agree with this, just get the best guys out there that fit somewhat. Us supposedly being interested in Bozeman should lead 
most to believe that this is the way Pollack and the FO are going to go about FA.
We will see. Just because Bozeman hasn't
been asked to block in a wide zone as much doesn't mean he can't.

Personally, I don't believe that being true at all.
Bengals often don't leak who they are targeting in FA.
Sounds like smoke and mirrors to me.
Zac Taylor 2019-2020: 6 total wins
Zac Taylor 2021-2022: Double-digit wins each season, plus 5 postseason wins
Zac Taylor 2023: 9 wins despite losing Burrow half the season
Zac Taylor 2024: Started 1-4. If he can turn this into a playoff appearance, it will be impressive.

Sorry for Party Rocking!

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
SI.com - FA OL Scheme Fits - ochocincos - 03-11-2022, 01:00 PM
RE: SI.com - FA OL Scheme Fits - Synric - 03-11-2022, 01:02 PM
RE: SI.com - FA OL Scheme Fits - Synric - 03-11-2022, 01:30 PM
RE: SI.com - FA OL Scheme Fits - fredtoast - 03-11-2022, 01:14 PM
RE: SI.com - FA OL Scheme Fits - magikod - 03-11-2022, 01:39 PM
RE: SI.com - FA OL Scheme Fits - Dr.Z - 03-11-2022, 02:58 PM
RE: SI.com - FA OL Scheme Fits - pulses - 03-11-2022, 08:32 PM
RE: SI.com - FA OL Scheme Fits - bfine32 - 03-11-2022, 04:52 PM
RE: SI.com - FA OL Scheme Fits - ochocincos - 03-11-2022, 07:56 PM
RE: SI.com - FA OL Scheme Fits - pulses - 03-11-2022, 08:18 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)