03-17-2022, 01:40 PM
(03-17-2022, 03:06 AM)Bilbo Saggins Wrote: Why not sign vets for them to compete with in camp? Vets along the lines of perhaps a Blythe or a Reiter tier of player? With this approach, if a younger guy outplays a vet in camp, they win the spot on the depth chart. Maybe they'd trade or cut a veteran at that point. I'm not arguing that they can fill every position. I just see it as negligent to not make every effort to have 5 OK starters and one backup who they can feel good about before the season starts. The identity of this team is that of a pass first offense that will live or die by its QB/starting WR trio. I'd double down on that identity by giving them more time to operate. Here's a grim stat: Joe Burrow is 2 for 2. He has played in two NFL seasons and has suffered a knee injury at some point during both of them. To just assume that he'll be like Russell Wilson or Ben Rothlisberger who can get by with fewer than 5 legitimate starters on the line seems like wishful thinking to me. If they spend more resources on the OL to ultimately have to make some difficult cuts after a bloodbath of competition, that seems like it'd be worth the investment. Brady, Peyton Manning, etc. were rightfully treated as the focal point of their respective teams - and rightfully so. Why not do the same for Burrow? Why not take every precaution so as to ensure that 2 for 2 doesn't become 3 for 3?
Either start drafting correctly or get someone who can. The Chiefs started two rookies in the OL. The center Humphrey graded #1 of all centers this year. Moses they should have gone after or resign Reiff to another 1 year deal and drafted an OT @ #31. It ain’t hard.
