03-17-2022, 07:41 PM
(03-17-2022, 07:22 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: It's better than nothing. If he were a #2 TE, it would be OK.
Hopefully we draft one in the 2nd or 3rd.
Agree. I think he'll be formidable but shouldn't be in our long term plans.
Baltimore does a good job of evaluating talent. Hurst wanted to be a #1 TE. Baltimore brought him in (I guess) to compete with Andrews and Andrews won. They knew he couldn't compete for #1 (he openly stated he wanted to be a #1) and they shipped him off to ATL.
I think it's safe to say the bar for Hurst will be something like 50/500/5.
