04-29-2022, 12:42 PM
(04-28-2022, 08:04 PM)Au165 Wrote: Not sure if you read it, but I think the issue here may have been the accuser couldn’t remember her cell phone number that was used to tell a bunch of people when asked. Eventually they figured out it’s the same number she had all along and they got a warrant for said record and within days closed the case. Something tells me there was something in the records that killed the credibility of the accuser but who knows.
I agree, these cases are historically handled poorly but I also think the people who were involved had more information than us, or the random person who wrote the article. I personally don’t care either way what happens to Carman but I do think if you read the whole article there are some weird things in there in even how the story is portrayed where it feels like the writer is trying to fill some gaps in on their own.
Screenshots of the text messages is kind of the first flag to me. The timing and/or phone numbers might not have matched up to her story when the phone records were pulled. You would be surprised how many people are shocked to learn that the cops have to get that stuff from the provider to ensure it hasn't been edited or otherwise tampered with.
Sadly, this stuff isn't uncommon in big programs. However, it's usually a pattern of behavior, not a one off thing like this seems to be. The other thing that really hurts her story is that if she's got a case, why is there no civil suit filed?
