Why Do You Like This Draft!

[Whatever]

(05-01-2022, 10:13 PM)NUGDUKWE Wrote: I disagree with this assessment. 
1: I don't think the investment in the Oline was the reason for any regression. I think Mahommes struggled to deal with some of the looks defenses were showing him and the offense as a whole didn't adjust.

2: A superbowl loss to a AFC championship loss is a small regression.

Now they did trade away Hill rather than pay him. So maybe you could blame the investment of the Oline as to why they couldn't pay Hill. But I think Hill skill set might've been part of why they struggled. Also they got a good return on him that they were able to add quite a bit.

KC still had the # 3 offense last year, only slightly worse than #1 the previous year.

The big regression was their defense, which slid from 16th to 27th.