08-01-2022, 12:24 PM
(08-01-2022, 12:05 PM)Sled21 Wrote: When Fred says DW broke no laws, he's full of it and he knows it. There were allegations of forcible sodomy. Just because there is not enough evidence for a conviction "Beyond a reasonable doubt" does not mean no laws were broken. They did not indict simply because there was not enough evidence to convict, as is often the casein sex cases. The GJ decision came prior to he women accepting settlements.
This is simply a case of the NFL paying for their Rapistburger 4 case suspension. TO come down hard on Watson give him the ability to scream racism.
I really didn't want to step foot in this thread... Not saying that Watson doesn't seem very scummy in this whole situation, but it actually wasn't enough evidence for even an indictment "probable cause". Twice. It never even got to the level where there could be a possibility of conviction. That's two different grand juries (24 people) who heard the whole case from a prosecutor (no defense attorney present) and didn't even think it warranted going to trial.
____________________________________________________________
The 2021 season Super Bowl was over 1,000 days ago.