Watson will play against Bengals

[fredtoast]

(08-01-2022, 04:01 PM)Au165 Wrote: Correct, there could have been implied physical intimidation because of his size and such and being secluded but no specific threat of violence. I would argue thought that his threat on her livelihood does have some weight to it and could be considered a form of intimidation as his public status would have enough weight to potentially cause monetary harm to her. 

Would you please step back and listen to what you are saying? Every time a man is alone with a woman that is smaller than him, even if she chose to be alone with him, he is guilty of intimidation if he asks her to have voluntary sex with him because of his size.

Don't you see a problem with that?

And a "threat to livelihood " is total BS if you have no control over the other persons employment.  Threatening to give a bad review on Yelp does not rise to the level of "intimidation" to justify a rape conviction.