What Vegas and the National Media is not talking about

[*PhilHos*]

(08-29-2022, 02:37 PM)Synric Wrote: Your argument is the defense had nothing to do with Patrick Mahomes bad second half. You are saying that Mahomes went from a nearly perfect first half to one of the worst second half by an in NFL history just because he started playing bad. You have repeatedly said the defense had nothing to do with this change because Kurt Warner said there was plays that could be made.


You'res so very wrong. The Defense adjusted there are tons of videos out there showing the rotating coverages and the changes from the first and second half you are ignoring all of this trying to argue the Bengals just got "lucky". 

There really isnt a point arguing because you really dont know what you are talking about. You are just repeating Kurt Warner said Mahomes did this but he should have done this but your neglecting one major question WHY did Mahomes do what he did compared to what Warner was showing after the fact.

I like how he argues that the 3rd and 27 play is "lucky" because of it's rarity, but then turns around and says our 2nd half defense against the Chiefs is lucky even though it happened TWICE IN THE SAME SEASON. How, if we really played good D, we'd do it all the time, but then turns around and, even though Burrow and Chase hooked up on multiple long passes all season long, it's "lucky" when they do it 1 time on 3rd and 27. 

fred's about as consistent as John Kerry was on the war in Iraq. lol