08-30-2022, 02:30 PM
(08-30-2022, 02:23 PM)Synric Wrote: Your question and arguement is irrelevant.
You are trying to call 1 play a fluke or luck by saying that 100+ more failed. You are ignoring the actual play and what happened trying to force feed a blanket stat without breaking down the play.
The conversion was not luck or a fluke it was capitalizing on the opportunity the defense presented. It's that simple.
My argument is not irrelevant at all.
Say you see a kid make a full court basketball shot. You tell him that was just luck because you know that a kid is going to make less than one percent of those type shots. But the kid says "That was just a perfect shot on my part. Doesn't matter that I miss the shot 99.9% of the time. You can't consider all those other misses. There was no luck involved in the shot I just made."
Is the kid right?
