08-31-2022, 05:38 PM
QB: A, if you have an elite QB you are set at QB. You don’t have a stud QB and then spend a bunch of money on a backup that could be used to make the rest of the roster better.
RB: A-, Joe is a stud. Solid depth behind him. It’s not a Chubb/Hunt scenario but short of that kind of luck we can’t complain much.
TE: D+ but it could be a C or C- once we see how Hurst performs. Depth is not good, top end talent isn’t great. Can’t give this group an above average grade.
WR: A-, top 3 are as good as it gets but bottom 3 drag the score down a bit. A legit #4 would make this group an A.
OL: C+, good across the board at starting spots with question on Volson. Depth isn’t great but no team has great OL depth. Just the nature of the league the last 10 years.
DL: B+, very good starters but not top level elite. Very good depth. No complaints from me.
LB: B+, could be A- if Logan plays great. Good depth.
CB: B-, would have liked another vet for depth and a healthy CTB. Could eventually upgrade the 2nd starting spot whether that be CTB or future pick/signing. Like this group as they play above their pay grade, but they are not perfect by any stretch. Good bang for the buck.
S: A, pretty simple imo
ST’s: A-, only a- because Huber was bad down the stretch last year. If he can get back to form it’s an A
RB: A-, Joe is a stud. Solid depth behind him. It’s not a Chubb/Hunt scenario but short of that kind of luck we can’t complain much.
TE: D+ but it could be a C or C- once we see how Hurst performs. Depth is not good, top end talent isn’t great. Can’t give this group an above average grade.
WR: A-, top 3 are as good as it gets but bottom 3 drag the score down a bit. A legit #4 would make this group an A.
OL: C+, good across the board at starting spots with question on Volson. Depth isn’t great but no team has great OL depth. Just the nature of the league the last 10 years.
DL: B+, very good starters but not top level elite. Very good depth. No complaints from me.
LB: B+, could be A- if Logan plays great. Good depth.
CB: B-, would have liked another vet for depth and a healthy CTB. Could eventually upgrade the 2nd starting spot whether that be CTB or future pick/signing. Like this group as they play above their pay grade, but they are not perfect by any stretch. Good bang for the buck.
S: A, pretty simple imo
ST’s: A-, only a- because Huber was bad down the stretch last year. If he can get back to form it’s an A
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
