10-02-2022, 09:43 AM
(10-02-2022, 08:41 AM)Essex Johnson Wrote: Yes agree it was smart to not pay him that $$ and pretty much replace with with another avg TE in Hurst for less especially since you know the targets are going to our trio of wr anyway as they should.
Hurst has more targets at 21 than Boyd has at 19 presently.
Not saying this is wise and want Boyd to get more targets actually, yet feel Hurst is doing fine.
The water tastes funny when you're far from your home,
yet it's only the thirsty that hunger to roam.
Roam the Jungle !