10-14-2022, 10:02 PM
(10-14-2022, 05:30 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: The Bengals were 12th in sacks last year. This year there are only 2 teams with less sacks than them despite the Bengals having the 6th most passing attempts against them.
They ARE on pace for 4 more INT this year than last, but their CBs have 0 so far, so I don't know how sustainable their current pace is unless the CBs put some stickum on their hands. I think we can safely assume Vonn Bell won't end up with 10 INT. Lol
Sacks aren't pressures TLL as we all know. Sacks are overrated even if I love a finisher like Trey Hendrickson.
Pressures are where it is at with most QB's including Andy Dalton our old QB who is a smart mutha.
I think we can safely assume that with Vonn Bell but our other secondary players could get some hands all of a sudden.
The NFL is weird this year and we are in every game with our roster.
(10-14-2022, 07:52 PM)jason Wrote: Ogunjobi was more important to the pass rush than many wanted to admit.
Spilled milk...
Doesn't mean BJ Hill and Zach Carter cannot do some of that. We will see.
Don't overpay for an injured splash player is still my vote, wouldn't do it any differently.
(10-14-2022, 07:58 PM)RegularGuy22 Wrote: Dalton may be the one doing the eating. He is still a cagey veteran that can read defenses better than JB. The score could easily be backwards even though Saints may be without key starters. I've seen this before, teams with key players out and backups playing and the Bengals always seem to struggle. Saints 27-17 and I hope I'm wrong. Just a feeling that Zac will once again give away points near goal line cause analytics told him to.
Hard to argue against this negative post with factual negative factors.
