12-07-2022, 11:30 AM
(12-07-2022, 10:17 AM)SHRacerX Wrote: Half just love to call them Bungles and can't get over the teams they had TWENTY FIVE FRIGGIN YEARS AGO. And the other half have seen the Bengals the last couple years and know they really have something. So, in other words, one group is dumb, the other is smart.
The dumb group didn't study the Bengals during the week for years. They were easy to tell, like Keyshawn or Skip Bayless, because they had the same stock answer every week. "Sure they're playing good now, but what's gonna happen in the playoffs? When they do something in January, then I'll be a believer. Until then . . ." until his 30 second segment about the upcoming Bengals vs ______ game is over and the host moves on to the next game on the lineup.
Now, instead of studying 31 teams and mailing it in on Cincinnati, they have to actually watch film and give fresh opinions. It's why I've always respected Peter Schrager's coverage of the Bengals, it's always well done and not mailed in long before he was a regular on the NFL Network. He would always tell Colin Cowherd positive stories when Cowherd would rip Cincinnati.
Only users lose drugs.
:-)-~~~
:-)-~~~
