12-19-2022, 12:47 PM
(12-19-2022, 07:09 AM)Rubekahn29 Wrote: Probably because it’s not worth comparing the other coaches prior to Marvin, as there is no contest at this point.
I do see the difference in decision making, but honestly, that likely more having Burrow at QB than who’s at head coach. If Zach had Andy in those situations, I’m not sure he’d put the ball in his hands like he does Burrow.
Compare Marv and Zach without our great QB Joe B.
Both had Andy and how did the team fare with the Red Rifle?
Both had injured QB's during the season and how did Zach do with an injured Joe B.?
Any logical person with any brains knows that Marvin elevated the Bengals to a higher level.
If he sucked like some people conclude then what of Shula, Coslett, LeBeau and Rice?
If Marvin had a vagina then what did Shula, Coslett, LeBeau and Rice have?
If time is the reference point then we should never mention Don Shula, Knoll, Madden, Parcells or Walsh.
Marvin had Palmer and Dalton and while Marvin made the post season twice with Palmer and Palmer also had post season success, Dalton has been around enough with several teams and never made the post season without Marvin.
Maybe the comparison should between Dalton and Burrow, we already know what Zach's record is without Burrow and with Dalton.