Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
"Fairly Tough Defense?"
#43
(12-18-2022, 10:07 PM)Science Friction Wrote: Flowers was good today.

Yep. I hope he doesn't play so well we cannot afford to bring him back. Thiugh if we win the SB because if his great play, I won't care. 

I was looking at our cap sheet, and I noticed that almost no backups make more than $2 mil. Dax Hill does, and he's a first round pick on a fixed salary (and likely to start when Bates leaves next year). The only reserve we chose to pay $2 mil+ to is Max Scharping, the #3 guard we picked up on waivers right before the season started when: we were unlikely sure about Volson and had the cap space. He is a FA. Next year, Carman will also be over $2 mil as a second round pick in year 3, but that is it. 

So, when doing a projection in our FA's, I thought it unlikely anyone who is not a starter would get $2 million or more. Bates, Bell, Pratt, Hurst, and Apple are all starters and all will be next year, save maybe Eli if CTB beats him out. Perine makes $1.8 this year, and I think he may be worth $2 mil+ as a backup. More if we decide to cut bait from Mixon. 

Flowers is also at $1.8 and a FA. He is more of a niche guy. Covering TE's. But he does it well. 
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
"Fairly Tough Defense?" - pally - 12-18-2022, 09:41 PM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - reuben.ahmed - 12-18-2022, 09:59 PM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - Big_Ern - 12-18-2022, 09:54 PM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - SladeX - 12-18-2022, 09:57 PM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - Stewy - 12-18-2022, 10:02 PM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - Big_Ern - 12-18-2022, 10:28 PM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - BengalsLUFC - 12-18-2022, 09:59 PM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - reuben.ahmed - 12-18-2022, 10:00 PM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - TheFan - 12-18-2022, 10:50 PM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - Big_Ern - 12-18-2022, 11:01 PM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - TheFan - 12-18-2022, 11:04 PM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - Big_Ern - 12-18-2022, 11:09 PM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - SladeX - 12-18-2022, 09:56 PM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - Synric - 12-18-2022, 09:57 PM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - Isaac Curtis: The Real #85 - 12-19-2022, 01:18 PM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - bengalfan74 - 12-18-2022, 10:38 PM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - WeezyBengal - 12-18-2022, 10:42 PM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - KillerGoose - 12-18-2022, 10:44 PM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - SunsetBengal - 12-19-2022, 10:34 AM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - bengalfan74 - 12-19-2022, 11:04 AM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - SladeX - 12-18-2022, 10:51 PM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - pally - 12-18-2022, 11:26 PM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - Bengalbug - 12-19-2022, 12:50 AM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - Stewy - 12-19-2022, 11:19 AM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - Sled21 - 12-19-2022, 10:28 AM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - GAWhoDey - 12-19-2022, 11:12 AM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - Interceptor - 12-19-2022, 12:47 PM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - GAWhoDey - 12-19-2022, 11:03 AM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - Stewy - 12-19-2022, 11:21 AM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - GAWhoDey - 12-19-2022, 12:56 PM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - PhilHos - 12-19-2022, 01:15 PM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - SunsetBengal - 12-19-2022, 01:21 PM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - Interceptor - 12-19-2022, 01:28 PM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - XenoMorph - 12-19-2022, 11:21 AM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - Bengalbug - 12-19-2022, 11:30 AM
RE: "Fairly Tough Defense?" - XenoMorph - 12-19-2022, 12:43 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)