01-03-2023, 11:14 AM
(01-03-2023, 11:07 AM)Bengalbug Wrote: If you can’t award a win/loss, you can’t award a tie. A tie is a result of a final score, just like a win or loss.
You could do no contest, and bills/bengals would only have 16 games. But the fallout is terrible.
Chiefs - good, likely the one seed.
Bills- bad, likely the two seed.
Bengals - good in the sense that you get the AFCN, bad that you likely cant get the 2 seed.
Ravens - irate. No chance of winning the division.
I feel like they, NFL, have to at least set a game time, and then the teams can do what they want regarding play/don’t play.
You'll need good will from somebody, but yes the distinctions between a tie and an no-contest are important here.
I think a no-contest works if we base the AFCN only on wins. They could then win the division if they beat us. That's why the game can't be called a tie, it just ruins the division title.
There isn't really a fair way to keep both the #1 seed and AFCN in play at the same time, short of replaying the game. And it's very questionable to say if that'd be a 'fair measure' either.
The League will have to dictate a result/NC I think.