What Zac has done that Marvin couldn't

[BFritz21]

(01-23-2023, 07:26 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: The Bengals brought in a bunch of guys with character concerns. They did it to add talent cheaper.

Zac is totally the opposite.

That and one could argue that Mike Brown did it because Paul Brown believed in giving people second chances, but I think it was more of Mike just thinking "we can get this kind of talent for cheap and the fans won't care as long as we're winning.

(01-23-2023, 07:27 PM)THE PISTONS Wrote: Marvin got this franchise out of the dark ages. If he didn't do that, I doubt Zac haves this success.

Marvin brought a lot of things up to league standard atleast.

I agree that Marvin did a lot for this franchise and Mike even acknowledged that Marvin had more control than any coach prior to him, and I'm thankful that he gave us a good team to cheer for, but he just wasn't a good head coach.