02-16-2023, 07:17 PM
(02-16-2023, 06:22 PM)casear2727 Wrote: Actually you were the first to bring up the max with your 80M per rant.
I only mentioned 50M for Joe's contract, where did I do that for Tee or Chase?
You keep using AAV like some amateur, and yet you know better, as you prove in your last sentence.
24M is not a big number for Tyreke Hill, it is all relevant to the player as to what is "expensive". The cap jumped 16M this year and will continue to rise.
Mahomes deal is absolutely relevant because that is the type of deal the Bengals are offering Joe, how can it be irrelevant?
Where did I say you did that for Tee or Chase? Neither Josh Allen or Patrick Mahomes' deals average $50m. So why would the year they reach $50m matter at all?
You either don't even know what year it is or can't do simple math to add 1 to the year, yet you're throwing out the term amateur. Lol
$24m is a big cap hit for any non-QB. It is a number that will dictate how you can build the rest of your team. The cap will continue to rise, and so will the contracts you have to give out. It isn't just free space added on. If it raises another $16m next year, $30m/yr will already be too low a number for Chase. Players see the cap rising and will make their price rise accordingly.
Mahomes deal is 3 years old, new trends have happened, new standards have been set, new ceilings constructed. The most recent deals are the only ones that matter for agents. We now live in a world where a non-top QB like Kyler Murray gets 44.8% of his deal guaranteed at signing (who, again, only gets 2 years of low cap when extended) and makes more on average than Mahomes, because the Browns gave Watson a fully guaranteed deal, so everyone else's numbers are going up. The same way you don't use a 3 year old comp for a house when trying to sell it, you don't use a 3 year old comp for a contract.
____________________________________________________________
